The United Nations, the most important international organization, has multifaceted criminal policy to fight against Genocide. Preventive criminal policy being one of the essential aspects of this policy has less effectiveness because of UN’ structure. In recent decades, UN has taken new approaches and changed from culture of genocide prevention to foresee of genocide. Responsibility to protect peoples from genocide and creation of Special Adviser of Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide, Special committee on the Prevention of Genocide and Human Right Council are conceptual and structural advancements in UN. Generally speaking, full effectiveness of UN’ criminal policy with regard to genocide, needs reformations in its structure, specially in security council’ structure and strong correlation with the other aspects of criminal policy, i.e. legislative, judicial and participative.

Background and objectives: The decline in the success and efficiency of traditional police tools in crime prevention has led to an increase in crime and the emergence of new forms of crime in society. The wider participation of non-governmental organizations and non-governmental and governmental organizations with the police is effective in preventing crime and correcting this process. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the preventive role of the police in participatory criminal policy.Methodology: In terms of its objectives this study is of an applied research type and in terms of the nature of data and methodology it is considered as a qualitative study. The participants in the research are experts and employees of police stations in Tehran. The sampling method is targeted sampling using snowball sampling up to theoretical saturation, which in this study is eleven people. The tools used for data collection were semi-structured interview, and for the validity of the research, peer review methods and review by participants were used. Test-re-test was also used for reliability. The calculated reliability is 93%. Data analysis was performed using content analysis method in three-step data encoding.Findings: Based on the interviews about the preventive role of the police in participatory criminal policy in the present study, 286 categories were identified and led to the development of eleven concepts, which are: participation of governmental organizations and departments, participation of non-governmental organizations, participation of people, participation through neighborhood-based prevention, public education, participation in the prevention of cybercrime, participation through increased awareness and interaction, holding meetings with trustees, outsourcing of duties, participation of scientific, cultural and social institutions, peace and reconciliation through restorative justice.Results: In the current state of society, the police can be successful in maintaining order and security when they use the capacity of the people, such as national and social capital, in the category of participatory police criminal policy. This participation of civil society requires active, purposeful and deliberate participation in accordance with crime prevention programs.

The Modem concept of criminal law include the Participative approach because today we cannot even imagine a criminal policy system without the Participation of society on the other hand the criminal policy includes many aspects and the way they are organized can lead of to are goals. In this respect the Participative prevention is considered as one of the main means that guaran tees the Participative criminal policy. This article focuses on a new definition of criminal policy and the rule of preventive plans in actional and reactional forms from theory to practice. It also emphesises it's application in judicial bill presenting imperilment to be approved. By bing approved it would become applicable and enjoy objective aspects.

Corruption, especially administrative corruption, has adverse effects on various dimensions of human society's life and is one of the main problems facing the world's political systems. The ratification of the United Nations Convention against Corruption Merida 2003 is an international confirmation of this. In the legal system of Iran, by joining this convention, various measures have been taken in the two dimensions of preventing administrative corruption and dealing with it criminally. In addition, Iran's legal system has also paid attention to international cooperation to fight corruption. According to the results of the research, there are still serious problems in some areas to effectively fight corruption, and the most important problems in this field is the lack of criminalization of administrative corruption. In the private sector, the non-adoption of differential criminal procedure for administrative corruption crimes, the absence of a comprehensive national program for the prevention of administrative corruption, the existence of parallel regulatory institutions and the lack of detailed explanation of their duties, are the lack of serious attention to the internal control system. Therefore, It can be said that Iran's legal system does not have the necessary coherence and coordination in the field of dealing with administrative corruption. Solutions to improve and promote the fight against corruption in two theoretical, research and practical formats should be considered. Solutions such as local and comparative research on the root corruption, including the large size of the

Background and Objective:  Crimes committed by government employees are directly related to administrative and economic corruption. The increasing rate of these crimes leads to public distrust in the political system. Given the government’s expanding role in economic affairs, this issue is a significant cause of administrative and economic corruption among government officials. The aim of this study is to identify and propose appropriate solutions. Research Method:  This study adopts an applied approach to the subject and is descriptive in nature and method. Data collection was conducted through document review and note-taking. Findings:  Iranian criminal policy makers in the legislative, judicial, and executive branches have sought to control and reduce the rate of these crimes by adopting reactive measures, enacting various criminal laws, and even intensifying the punishment of perpetrators of economic crimes and crimes committed by government employees. However, statistics and reports from international and domestic institutions in recent years indicate that the implementation of these policies has not been successful in reducing and controlling crimes committed by government employees. It seems that the best remedy is crime prevention. Conclusion:  The evolution of criminal policy has shown that criminal policy alone cannot reduce these crimes. In addition to criminal reactions, proactive and non-criminal measures should also be utilized in criminal policy. Differentiation, privatization, transparency, inspection, meritocracy, and ethical governance are preventive measures that should be planned and implemented to reduce crimes committed by government employees in Iran’s criminal policy.

In the criminal policy originating from the seeerah of Imam Ali (AS), human growth and excellence emerge in the light of preventing crimes and deviations. In other words, eliminating the opportunities that cause corruption leads to a person's guidance and perfection and access to true worship and happiness. In this research, using descriptive and analytical methods, it is concluded that social preventive policy is represented in two dimensions in the seerah of Imam Ali (AS). In the individual dimension, the role of belief in monotheism, piety, and moral orientation is essential. In the governance dimension, attention is paid to promoting virtue, preventing vice, and informing people about crime prevention. On the other hand, situational preventive policy exists in two official and unofficial dimensions, and its purpose is to balance the members of society and exclude crime-causing elements.

Corruption, in the commitment of systematic crimes, is the base of horrible activities of criminal organizations and is the inseparable element of the occurrence of economic crimes. Because of the importance of the negative influence of Corruption in the development of the social Justice and economic flourishing at societies, controlling that has always been a concern for the authorities and policymakers of each society and international authorities. Beside to the passing of the domestic laws in the countries regarding the control of various aspects of corruption, due to the dispersion of these regulations and lack of integral confrontation of governments with this phenomenon, diverse meetings are held in regional or international levels for the joint cooperation of governments and compilation of unified laws regulations which has had useful and effective consequences. One of the international measures related to the control of this phenomenon, is a Conference which was held by the United Nations on 2003 in Mexico Merida, this conference was lead to the drafting of the United Nations convention against corruption which is known as Merida Convention. Iran with its adherence to this convention has passed laws and regulations regarding the convention’s requirements. In the present article, while investigating the second chapter of the cited convention which is under the title of “preventive measures”, three legal subjects in our country which are: “Money laundry Act, Free access and circulation of the information Act and Health promotion of administration system and controlling the corruption Act” will be studied and these regulations are observed for the purpose of conforming with chapter two of the Merida Convention and we have reached this conclusion that the cited laws, are in conformity with the requirements of the cited convention in a remarkable rate.

Criminal policy may be assessed in a framework that is defined by the logical basic elements of crime. These are the motivated and able offender, the victim or target, and control. It is only in certain combinations of these three elements that a crime can take place, and criminal policy addresses one or several of these elements. The objectives of criminal policy are defined being fourfold: to minimize the social costs of crime,to minimize the costs of crime control,to distribute these costs,and to do this in a fair manner. It is such considerations that are to be accounted for if knowledge-based criminal policy is to be defined and implemented. In reallife terms, this is rarely being done comprehensively. Criminal policy is, in contrast, often simplistically understood as „, fighting crime“, , i. e. in terms of warfare. Today, criminal policy requires careful consideration in particular because both crimes and their environment are undergoing rapid change. This puts decision-making in a particularly demanding situation and accentuates the need for valid knowledge of the situation. Therefore, there is great need of updated research on old and new forms of crime, and such research should address all central elements of crime. The near future of criminal policy is much influenced by financial crisis. This creates high demands for a more consciously knowledge-based and better quality crime control. The near future may see both positive and negative developments, the negative ones being more likely if criminal policy is not made in a responsible and comprehensive manner. The alternative of a positive criminal policy is suggested as a utopian but achievable goal.

Background and Aim: With the growth and increasing statistics of financial and economic corruption in the banking and governmental-administrative systems in the past decade, the approach to combating such economic crimes has become a focus of criminal policy. Therefore, this research aims to analyze Iran's criminal policy in dealing with economic crimes and present preventive solutions.  Method: The present study is applied in purpose and descriptive-analytical in nature. Data was collected and analyzed using library resources, a wide range of documents and practices, as well as references to authoritative online books and other research works.  Findings: On one hand, laws and regulations, and on the other hand, preventive measures and criminal responses by the judiciary, along with managerial and executive actions by the government, have so far failed to eliminate the underlying factors of economic crimes in society or effectively combat them. In this regard, challenges such as the lack of precise identification of economic crime instances, incomplete categorization of these crimes, inadequate definitions of economic crimes, and weaknesses in utilizing preventive frameworks for economic crimes persist.  Conclusion: Iran's criminal policy in confronting economic crimes suffers from several serious flaws. This area faces fragmented laws, with security-centric approaches on one hand and populism, lack of a unified methodology in response, inappropriate criminal penalties, and failure to apply a hierarchical enforcement system in sentencing on the other. These factors hinder effective confrontation with economic crimes and their prevention